Supreme Court Limits Voting Rights Law
03.10.09 |
States are not obligated to redraw electoral lines to assure a minority victory if minorities do not make up the bulk of the area's population. That is the word from the Supreme Court, which reigned in the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act by a 5-4 vote on Monday.
At issue was a North Carolina voting district that lost black residents after the 2000 census. During redistricting, state lawmakers tried to put together an area with 39-percent African-American voters and a narrow margin of progressive whites. The coalition succeeded in electing an African American to the state's General Assembly.
However, the boundaries crossed over county lines, which is a no-no under North Carolina's constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected the so-called crossover district. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority, saying the area's black population must cross the 50-percent threshhold for the state to have to safeguard their voting rights.
Justice David Souter wrote the minority opinion arguing the ruling would create more pressure to design black or Latino-only districts, rather than having minorities and whites learn to forge alliances.
Tweet
CATEGORIES
AUTHORS
ARCHIVE BY MONTH
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008